Close

Articles Posted in Fourth Amendment

Updated:

Navarette v. California – The Court Giveth in McNeely and Taketh in Navarette

Just last term the United StatesSupreme Court held in McNeely v. Missouri, that a warrant is presumptively required before obtaining a blood sample from a drunk driving supsect. However this week, in Navarette v. California, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, held that a police officer does…

Updated:

McNeely Continued – Warrantless Breath Tests Violate the Fourth Amendment

In Missouri v. McNeely, the Supreme Court held: “In those drunk-driving investigations where police officers can reasonably obtain a warrant before a blood sample can be drawn without significantly undermining the efficacy of the search, the Fourth Amendment mandates that they do so.” At first blush, it appeared the main…

Updated:

Cops Gearing Up For St. Paddy’s Day – Beware!!!

Monday, March 17 is St. Patrick’s Day and the police will be ready so beware. A Prince George’s County Police press release stated: PGPD to Conduct St. Patrick’s Day Sobriety Checkpoint. Last year, nearly 550 drivers were arrested for DUI across Maryland on the St. Patrick’s Day weekend. We’re committed…

Updated:

To Plead Or Not To Plead (Guilty)? – That Is The Question

In Maryland courts, hundreds of DUI (driving under the influence) and DWI (driving while impaired) cases are heard every day. The vast majority of cases are resolved by the defendant pleading guilty on the terms offered by the prosecutor whether the defendant has a lawyer or not. However, in state…

Updated:

Oral argument in Navarette v. California – or – can police stop a car for a crime that can’t be prosecuted?

The U.S. Supreme Court held oral argument yesterday in the case of Navarette v. California. This case presents the important issue of when police can stop a car based on an anonymous tip without corroborating the details provided by the caller. An anonymous caller informed police that Navarette’s vehicle was…

Updated:

New Laws Take Effect Today

Electronic signs all over Maryland are telling drivers about the new laws that kicked in today. What exactly is going on? Two offenses that were previously denominated as secondary actions have been changed to primary actions. As the 90 day legislative report states: Senate Bill 339/House Bill 753 (both passed)…

Updated:

Supreme Court rules search warrant presumptively required before obtaining non-consensual blood draw – Missouri v. McNeely win!

The Supreme Court today announced its opinion in Missouri v. McNeely and ruled that police in DUI investigations may not automatically avoid seeking a search warrant to obtain a blood sample where the defendant does not consent to a blood test. This is the third win as amicus curiae for…

Updated:

Missouri v. McNeely argued today in the U.S. Supreme Court

Today, the Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Missouri v. McNeely. The case involved police obtaining a blood alcohol test without a warrant. The officer, who had previously had no difficulty obtaining warrants before getting blood samples in DUI cases had mistakenly believed that Missouri law had changed.…

Updated:

Supreme Court Accepts Another DUI Case

Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari sought by Missouri in Missouri v. McNeely. McNeely was suspected of DUI when police had blood withdrawn without a warrant. The Supreme Court of Missouri held that a warrant was required when the facts fell outside the narrow exception created in Schmerber v. California.…

Updated:

WBAL Interview, Thursday, February 2, 2011

Click below to listen to Lenny Stamm’s interview with DJ Kirk McEwen on WBAL on Thursday, February 2, 2011 at 9 p.m. 01 WBAL-AM Post Delay.mp3 02 WBAL-AM Post Delay.mp3 If you are facing criminal or traffic charges in Maryland state or federal court, call Leonard R. Stamm or Johanna…

Contact Us